The context of the answer given is also a key element to the notion of "passing" a Turing test. Perhaps also the age, background and biases of the person acting as the "Judge" will also determine whether it could "pass". In the end perhaps only another AI being fooled into thinking it was talking with a human would be a good circular test but, until we can imbue AI with "intuition", "feels", "skepticism" and crucially "sentience" (which we have yet to comprehend or understand - not just the how but the why and when of it) we are just playing at being gods of the machine.

The opening paragraph was a give-away in regards the answer to the question. The phrase "human like" is central to understanding the "final" end point of language output from these engines and data.

Although, the "function" of the ChatGPT is very impressive indeed, the coherence is astounding.

Thanks for highlighting this.