I am inclined to agree or, to sub-classify this generated content as gArt. I mean it can still BE called art but not wholly art, because IMHO art implies a meaning imbued most often by the creator but nominally through the experience of that art from the beholder. Perhaps really we should be calling it "Artificially Intelligent" rather than "Artificial Intelligence". A subtle difference but one that illustrates the gulf to be bridged between data and meaning, between binary and finery.